Attending to the noted significance of "context" in IT resistance, we carried out this review to understand how the "context" of healthcare in the extant HIT resistance literature has been studied. 2011; Morandi 2013; Ulhi et al. Trust results in less formal contractual agreements (Chin et al. Before the spread of writing, oral literature did not always survive well, but some texts and fragments have persisted. Information . In the following part we will discuss the findings from the literature we reviewed. An official website of the United States government. Chin, C. M. M., Yap, E. H., & Spowage, A. C. (2011). This means that we will focus on research partnerships, collaborative research, contract research and consulting while collaborations with limited interaction or that require little or no new research are excluded. Differences in goals originate from differences in market orientation (Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios 2016), priorities in norms (Al-Tabbaa and Ankrah 2016; Mesny and Mailhot 2007), and different logics for the sharing of knowledge (Steinmo 2015). (2013), but we did not find relevant papers in this period. 2014; Wallin et al. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal These factors and their definitions (see below) were used to decide which of the papers on academic engagement in our results discussed topics that could be related to knowledge transfer. 2012). When shared goals are lacking it becomes more difficult to understand the implications and cause effect relations of the knowledge developed, which causes ambiguity (Partha and David 1994). How can failure and success of knowledge transfer be explained? His hypotheses is that in the case of radically new technologies knowledge is so different from existing knowledge that knowing how to organize the implementation of new technologies becomes more relevant. Over time and through close collaboration the boundary spanner gets a better understanding of the partners needs and knowledge background. We noticed that cultural differences is used as an aggregated term for different goals, organizational and managerial differences and epistemic norms. We searched in: titles, keywords and abstracts using the terms: Universitybusiness, universityindustry academic engagement and research partnership (other terms for university such as Academ* and Higher Education science did not yield additional results), combined with one of the terms collaborat*, cooperation*, partnership*, engage*, relation* research alliance*. There are not many papers that focus explicitly on knowledge transfer in academic engagement (Bruneel et al. 23(1), 128157. Research that differentiates between cognitive or goal related differences and routine based differences indicates that these factors affect collaborations differently (Corley et al. In that section we provide an overview of theoretical perspectives and activities that have been described in previous research. The literature we reviewed uses the term cultural differences to indicate differences in project goals, expected outcomes, visions on required research activities, the allocation of time and resources, management styles, social conducts, cognitive differences, different language and time perception (Bjerregaard 2010; Galan-Muros and Plewa 2016; Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios 2016; Harryson et al. How to say extant literature in sign language? 2015; Ulhi et al. Secondly, trust is mainly researched in quantitative research in relation to general collaboration success. r.+IT8&"C0\&nnaxd)T{U`A ;CZpJ[D\V=!'8Pb666hr|DDJ9BJJ@ ]SA BlfFpR@p$^Bs0dsw.YHv TBu#P5 UAAl[;Et9`VM g5tyo/0?`P`C iL+=`YiJ}
*Kt wF#}
"'914F^RHKy,*\rVg'p>c\rZDrYU,YX:g0pJ@vB-y` J
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to universityindustry collaboration. The paper is believed to add value to the understanding of FinTech in light of the emerging threats and opportunities for its various stakeholders. In total we found about 890 unique papers. We will discuss each of these aspects in the following paragraphs. We use the term to refer to institutionalized daily events at a workplace (Nicolini 2009). 19(1), 3140. This paper can be used by other novice researchers as an example of the decision-making process that led to delaying a pre-study literature review and identifies the resources used to write a research proposal when using a classic grounded theory approach. 44(2), 418431. 2007). Nurse Res. International Journal of Management Reviews, In collaborations with low engagement the firm is seen as data source, while all research activities are controlled and conducted by the academic partner. Measuring the performance of research collaborations. In our view, an increased understanding of when informal or formal management mechanisms are used is needed. %PDF-1.6
%
Communication to determine goals and to discuss what information can be published is the most important way to deal with these differences. 2014; Pinheiro et al. The role of inter-partner dissimilarities in industryuniversity alliances: Insights from a comparative case study. In practice, the role of the industrial partner in data analysis and theory development is limited, even in deep collaborations. Ivory tower and industrial innovation. 2015). Cohen, W. M. (2002). 31(3), 387408. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. The term cultural differences is used to indicate a lack of shared meaning and social conventions (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998). A comprehensive assessment. Ghauri, P., & Rosendo-Rios, V. (2016). Journal of Management Studies, Coordination is often effected informally between project managers from both sides (Barnes et al. In high collaborations the firm contributes through the identification of research problems, grounding the design and data collection in the application context and by assisting academics in making decisions. 2015). (2010), Cyert and Goodman (1997), Liyanage and Mitchell (1994), Partha and David (1994), Galan-Muros and Plewa (2016) and Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios (2016). Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Brostrm, A., DEste, P., et al. Little attention has been paid to the practices required to build trust or the effect of trust on knowledge transfer specifically. Firms indicated that different logics remained problematic for the development of useful interaction with universities, but that this disadvantage was outweighed by the benefits of the collaboration (Morandi 2013). Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). 2013a; Schartinger et al. Ulhi et al. 0000122947 00000 n
This complicates collaboration because different languages, opinions, social behaviours, norms and beliefs make the interpretation of behaviour and knowledge more difficult (Lane and Lubatkin 1998; Mowery and Shane 2002; Simonin 1999). Yet, as surmised by Fink (2009), "A research literature review is a systematic, explicit, and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars, and practitioners" [emphasis added] (p. 3). (2013) and Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa (2015) we used the principles and process of a systematic literature review (Tranfield et al. In the remainder of this paper we present the stylised model and the implications of our analysis for future research and management. 2011; Galan-Muros and Plewa 2016; Hadjimanolis 2006; Harryson et al. Before A classic approach avoids a pre-study literature review to minimise preconceptions and emphasises the constant comparison method, while the Straussian and constructivist approaches focus more on the beneficial aspects of an initial literature review and researcher reflexivity. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. The logic of tacit inference. 35(1), 128152. Because industrial partners lack the time to dive into the data and feel unequipped to participate truly in the academic debate (McCabe et al. 2002; Gertner et al. Therefore, it is often recommended to start with small projects, like student projects, and build to more complex collaborations and more fundamental questions from there (Buganza et al. The paper summarizes the research and findings in this emerging field. 40(4), 539552. Mercy College New York. Therefore, the role of experience to mitigate knowledge differences remains unclear. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 0000000956 00000 n
42(2), 423442. Experience with the collaboration partner has been found to mitigate problems relating to differences in goals, because it leads to more realistic expectations and better insight in the partners needs (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015; Steinmo 2015; Wallin et al. 22(7), 597624. The factors relating to cognitive differences are ambiguity and absorptive capacity. Accessed 1 May. 0000019151 00000 n
(2004). Which shows that tacit knowledge is transferred in four steps; (1) through creating shared experiences (socialization), after which knowledge is (2) externalized, (3) recombined and (4) internalized. Organizational Dynamics, Morandi, V. (2013). International Journal of Management Reviews, The extant research demonstrates that para-lawyers can be as effective as lawyers in providing specific legal services. The risk in this kind of work is that projects deviate from original plans, or that changes in plans are not well administrated and lead to discussion later on. Based on the review, avenues for future research studies are outlined.,The review of extant literature reveals that several SMA techniques such as competitor accounting, strategic pricing, benchmarking and customer accounting have been highly or moderately adopted in several developed countries while majority of other techniques remained at the . 0000122316 00000 n
The term research generated results for a broad range of terms used to indicate collaborations such as joint research, collaborative research, contract research and so on. Gertner, D., Roberts, J., & Charles, D. (2011). 2(2), 119133. During the collaboration knowledge is best transferred through rich, meaningful, direct and bilateral interaction, especially when tacit knowledge is involved. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, At the same time strict conflict of interest policies are in place to prevent conflicts of interests. They focus on fundamental research, but use market developments to inspire their research. Philosophy, 2015; Steinmo 2015; Wallin et al. In this review we discuss which theoretical frames could deepen our understanding of universityindustry (UI) knowledge transfer, identify barriers and facilitators of knowledge transfer and use a practices perspective to identify ways to deal with these barriers. Qualitative research in this field is often very descriptive and does not refer to theoretical concepts. Creating creative chaos in interactive sessions provides a way to learn autonomic and recombine the new insights with previous knowledge, which facilitates absorption (Johnson and Johnston 2004). In that case the successful use of the knowledge depends on whether it can be appropriated to the application contexts (Alexander and Childe 2013; Sandberg et al. 30(2), 100108. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. Second, we identified the information that related to knowledge transfer and included this in our table. Qualitative and quantitative research has both identified factors which influence knowledge transfer, but have not integrated their results. We also identified the practices that could help to overcome those barriers. (2006). Toward a new economics of science. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the 2016; Mesny and Mailhot 2007; Plewa et al. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Although university income from academic engagement outranks income derived from selling intellectual property (IP) (Perkmann et al. However, there are other ways for academics to ensure application of their knowledge these practices focus predominantly on knowledge exchange (Salter and Martin 2001; Alexander and Childe 2013). Although cognitive distance does not diminish the propensity to collaborate, it does limit interaction during the collaboration. This way they manage to secure industrial funding. R&D Management, If the abstract was unclear about the content, the decision to include a paper was made after scanning the whole paper. Such integration would increase the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The paper reports that FinTech promises huge potential for further study by various stakeholders in the FinTech industry from academia to practitioners to regulators. The abstraction level we use is such that it can be translated into managerial implications. Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. 25(2), 162179. Web. The process of doing a research proposal involves critical analysis of the extant literature in order to map out what is already known about the topic and to identify the gaps in knowledge (McGhee, Marland, & Atkinson, 2007; Dunne, 2011). Research Policy, be extrapolated from extant literature because, as we discuss in Section II, the literature does not agree whether auditors are punished or rewarded for GAAP-related failures. Therefore, we changed the search strategy to an approach in which we used broad Boolean search strings to identify papers on academic engagement from which we manually selected the ones that discuss research partnerships in relation to knowledge transfer. The next step was to analyse the papers we selected. 46(2), 369382. Universitiesindustry collaboration strategies: A micro-level perspective. Henny J. van der Windt. 2016). Jbqv+ ;:ab Boundary spanners are often personnel that is exchanged between academia and industry during the course of the collaboration. Accessibility Also, there seems to be agreement that secondment, employee exchange and hiring graduates are important ways to transfer the tacit aspects of knowledge in both directions.
Wzzk Sunday Morning Gospel,
Former Ketv Reporters,
Articles E